![]() ![]() I use both products you name and especially fluid mask 3 has smoother edges then either photoshop or mask pro. Markedly improved its selection tools that I no longer see any need With tools like Quick Selection and Refine Edge, Photoshop has Over PS and in fact one major flaw of Mask Pro is that it doesn't The subject will be extracted, neither of them offered an advantage Working on high resolution images that were shot with the idea that That can be done with those two programs can be done in Photoshop. Opinion they are not worth the investment of time and effort all I've used both Fluid Mask 3 and Mask Pro 4 in the past and in my ![]() Was hoping these programs would offerĭramatic improvement on workflow and quality of results. Already familiar with numerous "Photoshop only" methods, likeĭr. Programs to work up to their fairly high cost. Looking for encouragement to justify continued effort to get the The effort toįine-tune in these programs seems more difficult than just hand Semi-hard edges, like a white shirt shoulder against a darkīackground - I get ragged, partial see-though cuts. Leafless dark tree branches against a blank sky - I get either To moderate objects in my real-world images.Įach program has numerous control settings, and I think I understand But I've got no joy using these programs to mask off simple And reviews of both programs give nothing but glowing I downloaded demo version of each masking program, and also watchedĪll of their tutorial videos. With tools like Quick Selection and Refine Edge, Photoshop has markedly improved its selection tools that I no longer see any need for third-party masking products.Īnybody having success with Fliud Mask 3 or Mask Pro 4 on real-world Working on high resolution images that were shot with the idea that the subject will be extracted, neither of them offered an advantage over PS and in fact one major flaw of Mask Pro is that it doesn't allow you to work on a background layer. I've used both Fluid Mask 3 and Mask Pro 4 in the past and in my opinion they are not worth the investment of time and effort all that can be done with those two programs can be done in Photoshop. Was hoping these programs would offer dramatic improvement on workflow and quality of results. Already familiar with numerous "Photoshop only" methods, like Dr. ![]() Or confirmation that it's not worth the effort. Looking for encouragement to justify continued effort to get the programs to work up to their fairly high cost. The effort to fine-tune in these programs seems more difficult than just hand painting or drawing a mask. Semi-hard edges, like a white shirt shoulder against a dark background - I get ragged, partial see-though cuts. Leafless dark tree branches against a blank sky - I get either horrendous halos or partial selections. But I've got no joy using these programs to mask off simple to moderate objects in my real-world images.Įach program has numerous control settings, and I think I understand them. And reviews of both programs give nothing but glowing praise. The video tuts make these two programs look easy. I downloaded demo version of each masking program, and also watched all of their tutorial videos. Anybody having success with Fliud Mask 3 or Mask Pro 4 on real-world high resolution images?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |